Migration Toolkit for Applications 7.2

Rules Development Guide

Create custom rules to enhance migration coverage.

Red Hat Customer Content Services

Abstract

This guide describes how to create custom XML rules for the Migration Toolkit for Applications.

Making open source more inclusive

Red Hat is committed to replacing problematic language in our code, documentation, and web properties. We are beginning with these four terms: master, slave, blacklist, and whitelist. Because of the enormity of this endeavor, these changes will be implemented gradually over several upcoming releases. For more details, see our CTO Chris Wright’s message.

Chapter 1. Introduction

1.1. About the Rule Development Guide

This guide is intended for software engineers who want to create custom YAML-based rules for Migration Toolkit for Applications (MTA) tools.

See the Introduction to the Migration Toolkit for Applications for an overview and the CLI Guide for details.

1.1.1. Use of <MTA_HOME> in this guide

This guide uses the <MTA_HOME> replaceable variable to denote the path to your MTA installation.

The mta-7.2.0-cli<OS>.zip* extracts a single binary called mta-cli.

When you encounter <MTA_HOME> in this guide, replace it with the actual path to your MTA installation.

1.2. The MTA rules

The Migration Toolkit for Applications (MTA) contains rule-based migration tools (analyzers) that you can use to analyze the application user interfaces (APIs), technologies, and architectures used by the applications you plan to migrate. MTA analyzer rules use the following rule pattern:

when(condition)
 message(message)
 tag(tags)

You can use the MTA rules internally to perform the following tasks:

  • Extract files from archives.
  • Decompile files.
  • Scan and classify file types.
  • Analyze XML and other file content.
  • Analyze the application code.
  • Build the reports.

MTA builds a data model based on the rule execution results and stores component data and relationships in a graph database. This database can then be queried and updated as required by the migration rules and for reporting purposes.

Note

You can create your own custom analyzer rules. You can use custom rules to identify the use of custom libraries or other components that might not be covered by the provided standard migration rules.

Chapter 2. Creating YAML rules

Each analyzer rule is a set of instructions that are used to analyze source code and detect issues that are problematic for migration.

The analyzer parses user-provided rules, applies them to applications' source code, and generates issues for matched rules.

A collection of one or more rules forms a ruleset. Creating rulesets provides a way of organizing multiple rules that achieve a common goal.

The analyzer CLI takes rulesets as input arguments.

2.1. YAML rule structure and syntax

Rules are written in YAML. They consist of:

  • metadata
  • conditions
  • actions

Rules instruct the analyzer to take specified actions when given conditions match.

A YAML rule file in MTA contains one or more YAML rules.

2.1.1. Rule metadata

Rule metadata contains general information about the rule. The structure of metadata is as follows:

ruleID: "unique_id" 1
labels: 2
  # key=value pair
  - "label1=val1"
  # valid label with value omitted
  - "label2"
  # valid label with empty value
  - "label3="
  # subdomain prefixed key
  - "konveyor.io/label1=val1"
effort: 1 3
category: mandatory 4
1
ruleID: This is a unique ID for the rule. It must be unique within the ruleset.
2
labels: A list of string labels associated with the rule. (See Labels)
3
effort: Effort is an integer value that indicates the level of effort needed to resolve this issue.
4
category: Category describes severity of the issue for migration. Values can be one of mandatory, potential or optional. For more deails, see Rule categories.

2.2. Rule labels

Labels are key=val pairs specified for rules or rulesets as well as dependencies. For dependencies, a provider adds the labels to the dependencies when retrieving them. Labels on a ruleset are automatically inherited by all the rules that belong to it.

Label format

Labels are specified under the labels field as a list of strings in key=val format as follows:

labels:
- "key1=val1"
- "key2=val2"

The key of a label can be subdomain-prefixed:

labels:
- "konveyor.io/key1=val1"

The value of a label can be empty:

labels:
- "konveyor.io/key="

The value of a label can be omitted. In that case, it is treated as an empty value:

labels:
- "konveyor.io/key"

Reserved labels

The analyzer defines some labels that have special meaning as follows:

  • konveyor.io/source: Identifies the source technology to which a rule or a ruleset applies.
  • konveyor.io/target: Identifies the target technology to which a rule or a ruleset applies.

Label selector

The analyzer CLI takes the --label-selector field as an option. It is a string expression that supports logical AND, OR, and NOT operations. You can use it to filter-in or filter-out rules by their labels.

Examples:

  • To filter-in all rules that have a label with the key konveyor.io/source and value eap6:

    --label-selector="konveyor.io/source=eap6"

  • To filter-in all rules that have a label with the key konveyor.io/source and any value:

    --label-selector="konveyor.io/source"

  • To perform logical AND operations on matches of multiple rules by using the && operator:

    --label-selector="key1=val1 && key2"

  • To perform logical OR operations on matches of multiple rules by using the || operator:

    --label-selector="key1=val1 || key2"

  • To perform a NOT operation to filter-out rules that have key1=val1 label set by using the ! operator:

    --label-selector="!key1=val1"

  • To group sub-expressions and control precedence by using AND:

    --label-selector="(key1=val1 || key2=val2) && !val3"

Dependency labels

The analyzer engine adds labels to dependencies. These labels provide additional information about a dependency, such as its programming language and whether the dependency is open source or internal.

Currently, the analyzer adds the following labels to dependencies:

labels:
- konveyor.io/dep-source=internal
- konveyor.io/language=java

Dependency label selector

The analyzer CLI accepts the --dep-label-selector option, which allows filtering-in or filtering-out incidents generated from a dependency by their labels.

For example, the analyzer adds a konveyor.io/dep-source label to dependencies with a value that indicates whether the dependency is a known open source dependency.

To exclude incidents for all such open source dependencies, you can use --dep-label-selector as follows:

konveyor-analyzer …​ --dep-label-selector !konveyor.io/dep-source=open-source

The Java provider in the analyzer can also add an exclude label to a list of packages. To exclude all such packages, you can use --dep-label-selector and the ! operator as follows:

konveyor-analyzer …​ --dep-label-selector !konveyor.io/exclude

2.3. Creating a basic YAML rule

This section describes how to create a basic MTA YAML rule. This assumes that you already have MTA installed. See the MTA CLI Guide for installation instructions.

2.3.1. Creating a basic YAML rule template

MTA YAML-based rules have the following basic structure:

when(condition)
 message(message)
 tag(tags)

Procedure

  1. In the /home/<USER>/ directory, create a file containing the basic syntax for YAML rules as follows:

    - category: mandatory
      description: |
       <DESCRIPTION TITLE>
       <DESCRIPTION TEXT>
      effort: <EFFORT>
      labels:
      - konveyor.io/source=<SOURCE_TECH>
      - konveyor.io/target=<TARGET_TECH>
      links:
     - url: <HYPERLINK>
       title: <HYPERLINK_TITLE>
      message: <MESSAGE>
      tag:
      - <TAG1>
      - <TAG2>
      ruleID: <RULE_ID>
      when:
       <CONDITIONS>

2.3.2. Rule categories

  • mandatory: You must resolve the issue for a successful migration. If you do not make the changes, the resulting application will not build or run successfully. Examples include the replacement of proprietary APIs that are not supported in the target platform.
  • optional: If you do not resolve the issue, the application should work, but the results might not be optimal. If you do not make the change at the time of migration, it is recommended to include it on the schedule soon after your migration is completed.
  • potential: You need to examine the issue during the migration process, but there is not enough detailed information to determine if the task is mandatory for the migration to succeed. An example of such an issue is migrating a third-party proprietary type when there is no directly compatible type on the target platform.

2.3.3. Rule actions

Rules can include the following types of actions:

  • message
  • tag

Each rule includes either one of them or both of them.

Message actions

When a message action matches the rule, it creates an issue. The custom data that providers export can be used in the message.

- ruleID: test-rule
  when:
    <CONDITION>
  message: Test rule matched. Please resolve this migration issue.

Optionally, a message can include hyperlinks to external URLs that provide relevant information about the issue or a quick fix.

links:
  - url: "konveyor.io"
    title: "Short title for the link"

A message can also be a template to include information about the match interpolated through custom variables on the rule.

2.3.4. Rule conditions

Each rule has a when block, which specifies a condition that needs to be met for MTA to perform a certain action.

The when block contains one condition, but that condition can have multiple conditions nested under it.

when:
  <condition>
    <nested-condition>

MTA supports the following types of conditions:

  • provider
  • and
  • or

2.3.5. Tag actions

A tag action instructs the analyzer to generate one or more tags for the application when a match is found. Each string in the tag field can be a comma-separated list of tags. Optionally, you can assign categories to tags.

tag:
  - "tag1,tag2,tag3"
  - "Category=tag4,tag5"

Example

- ruleID: test-rule
  when:
    <CONDITION>
  tag:
  - Language=Golang
  - Env=production
  - Source Code

A tag can be a string or a key=val pair, where the key is treated as a tag category in MTA. Any rule that has a tag action is referred to as a “tagging rule” in this document.

Note

Issues are not created for rules that contain only tag actions.

2.3.6. Message action

A message action is employed to generate an issue with the specified message when a rule matches, for example:

# When a match is found, the analyzer generates incidents with the same message.
message: "helpful message about the violation"

You can also create a template message to include information about the match that has been interpolated through custom variables on the rule.

- ruleID: lang-ref-004
   customVariables:
   - pattern: '([A-z]+)\.get\(\)'
      name: VariableName
    message: "Found generic call - {{ VariableName }}"
  when:
    <CONDITION>

2.3.8. Provider condition

The analyzer engine enables multi-language source code analysis by using providers. The source code of a technology is analyzed by the provider.

The provider publishes what they can do with the source code in terms of capabilities.

The provider condition instructs the analyzer to use a specific provider and one of its capabilities. In general, it follows the <provider_name>.<capability> pattern.

when:
  <provider_name>.<capability>
    <input_fields>

The analyzer currently supports the following provider conditions:

  • builtin
  • java
  • go
  • dotnet
Important

Support for providing a single report when analyzing multiple applications on the CLI is a Technology Preview feature only. Technology Preview features are not supported with Red Hat production service level agreements (SLAs) and might not be functionally complete. Red Hat does not recommend using them in production. These features provide early access to upcoming product features, enabling customers to test functionality and provide feedback during the development process.

For more information about the support scope of Red Hat Technology Preview features, see Technology Preview Features Support Scope.

Provider rule conditionsProvider name

Providers that are fully supported and included in the product

Java

Providers that have rules already defined in the product

.NET

Providers that require custom rulesets for analysis

  • Go
  • Python
  • Node.js
Note

Depending on the provider, the fields of the condition, for example, the pattern and location in the previous example changes.

Some providers have dependency_ capability. The dependency_capability means that the provider generates a list of dependencies for a given application.

You can use a dependency_condition to query this list and check whether a certain dependency, with a version range, exists for the application.

For example, to check if a Java application has a certain dependency, you create a java.dependency condition:

when:
  java.dependency:
    name: junit.junit
    upperbound: 4.12.2
    lowerbound: 4.4.0

The Analyzer currently supports the following providers:

  • builtin
  • java
  • go
  • generic

The following table summarizes all the providers and their capabilities:

Table 2.1. Summary of providers and their capabilities

Provider NameCapabilitiesDescription

java

referenced

Find references of a pattern with an optional code location for detailed searches.

dependency

Check whether the application has a given dependency.

builtin

xml

Search XML files using xpath queries.

json

Search JSON files using jsonpath queries.

filecontent

Search content in regular files using regular expression patterns.

file

Find files with names matching a given pattern.

hasTags

Check whether a tag is created for the application using a tagging rule.

go

referenced

Find references to a pattern.

dependency

Check whether the application has a given dependency.

Following the example in the previous table, you can create the first part of the condition that does not contain any of the condition fields.

Example

To create a java provider condition that uses the referenced capability:

when:
  java.referenced:
    <fields>
Note

Depending on the provider and the capability, there will be different <fields> in the condition.

The following table summarizes available providers, their capabilities and all of their fields:

Table 2.2. Summary of providers, their capabilities, and their fields

ProviderCapabilityFieldsRequiredDescription

java

referenced

pattern

Yes

Regex pattern

location

No

Source code location (see Java locations)

annotated

No

Additional query to inspect annotations (see Annotation inspection).

dependency

name

Yes

Name of the dependency.

nameregex

No

Regex pattern to match the name.

upperbound

No

Match versions lower than or equal to

lowerbound

No

Match versions greater than or equal to

builtin

xml

xpath

Yes

Xpath query

namespaces

No

A map to scope down query to namespaces

filepaths

No

Optional list of files to scope down search

json

xpath

Yes

Xpath query

filepaths

No

Optional list of files to scope down search

filecontent

pattern

Yes

Regex pattern to match in content

filePattern

No

Only search in files with names matching this pattern

file hasTags

pattern

Yes

Find files with names matching this pattern

hasTags

  

This is an inline list of string tags. See Tag action

go

referenced

pattern

Yes

Regex pattern.

dependency

name

Yes

Name of the dependency.

nameregex

No

Regex pattern to match the name.

upperbound

No

Match versions lower than or equal to.

lowerbound

No

Match versions greater than or equal to.

Example

For example, to complete the previous java condition example we created earlier, search for references of a package:

when:
  java.referenced:
    location: PACKAGE
    pattern: org.jboss*

2.3.8.1. Builtin provider

The builtin is an internal provider that can analyze various files and internal metadata generated by the engine. This provider has the following capabilities:

  • file
  • filecontent
  • xml
  • json
  • hasTags

file

By using the file capability, the provider searches for files in the source code that match a given pattern.

when:
  builtin.file:
    pattern: "<regex_to_match_filenames>"

filecontent

By using the filecontent capability, the provider searches for content that matches a given pattern.

when:
  builtin.filecontent:
    filePattern: "<regex_to_match_filenames_to_scope_search>"
    pattern: "<regex_to_match_content_in_the_matching_files>"

xml

The xml capability enables the provider to query XPath expressions on a list of provided XML files. This capability takes 2 input parameters, xpath and filepaths.

when:
  builtin.xml:
    xpath: "<xpath_expressions>" 1
    filepaths: 2
      - "/src/file1.xml"
      - "/src/file2.xml"
1
xpath must be a valid XPath expression.
2
filepaths is a list of files to apply the XPath query to.

json

By using the json capability, the provider queries XPath expressions on a list of provided JSON files. Currently, json only takes XPath as input and performs the search on all JSON files in the codebase.

when:
  builtin.json:
    xpath: "<xpath_expressions>" 1
1
xpath must be a valid XPath expression.

hasTags

By using the hasTags capability, the provider queries application tags. It queries the internal data structure to check whether the application has the given tags.

when:
  # when more than one tag is given, a logical AND is implied
  hasTags:  1
    - "tag1"
    - "tag2"
1
When more than one tag is given, a logical AND is implied.

2.3.8.2. Java provider

The java provider analyzes Java source code.

This provider has the following capabilities:

  • referenced
  • dependency

referenced

By using the referenced capability, the provider finds references in the source code. This capability takes three input parameters: pattern, location, and annotated.

when:
  java.referenced:
    pattern: "<pattern>" 1
    location: "<location>" 2
    annotated: "<annotated>" 3
1
A regular expression pattern to match.
2
Specifies the exact location where the pattern needs to be matched, for example, IMPORT.
3
Checks for specific annotations and their elements, such as name and value, in the Java code using a query. For example, the following query matches the Bean (url = “http://www.example.com”) annotation in the method.
 annotated:
      pattern: org.framework.Bean
      elements:
      - name: url
        value: "http://www.example.com"

2.3.8.3. Java locations

The java provider allows scoping the search down to certain source code locations.

  • IMPORT: IMPORT allows for searches on class imports. It can either be used with FQNs or an asterisk to allow for wider matches:
java.referenced:
  pattern: org.apache.lucene.search*
  location: IMPORT

would match on each of these imports:

import org.apache.lucene.search.Query;
import org.apache.lucene.search.Sort;
import org.apache.lucene.search.SortField;

range of results, it is recommended to place it directly after the package, not after the dot:

  • PACKAGE: the PACKAGE location matches on any usage of a package, be it in an import or used as part of a fully qualified name in the code:
java.referenced:
  pattern: org.apache.lucene.search*
  location: PACKAGE

would match on both the import and the fully qualified usage:

import org.apache.lucene.search.*;
public class Test {
  private org.apache.lucene.search.Query query;
}

(*) right after the package-separation dot (.) for better results.

  • CONSTRUCTOR_CALL and METHOD_CALL: for matching constructors and methods, respectively. The pattern possibilities are quite varied, and it is possible to match against specific return types, arguments, etc.

For instance, looking for a method named “method” declared on org.konveyor.MyClass that returns a List of a type that extends java.lang.String and accepts a single parameter:

java.referenced:
  location: METHOD
  pattern: 'org.konveyor.Myclass.method(*) java.util.List<? extends java.lang.String>'

More information about the possibilities of these patterns can be found in the official Java documentaion, which contain all the information for building these patterns in the createPattern(String, int, int, int) section.

Warning

Presently, fully qualified static method matching is prone to errors.

  • TYPE: matches against types in general, appearing anywhere.
  • INHERITANCE: matches against a class inheriting from a given type.
  • ANNOTATION: matches against annotations.
  • IMPLEMENTS_TYPE: matches against any type implementing the given type.
  • ENUM_CONSTANT: matches against enum constants.
  • RETURN_TYPE: matches against a type being returned by a method.
  • VARIABLE_DECLARATION: matches against a type being declared as a variable.
  • FIELD (declaration): matches against a type appearing in a field declaration. It can be coupled with an annotation match, this is, an annotation happening on the field (see Annotation inspection)
  • METHOD: matches against a given method declaration. It can be coupled with an annotation match (see Annotation inspection).
  • CLASS (declaration): matches against a given method declaration. Can be coupled with an annotation match (see Annotation inspection).

The supported locations are the following:

  • CONSTRUCTOR_CALL
  • TYPE
  • INHERITANCE
  • METHOD_CALL
  • ANNOTATION
  • IMPLEMENTS_TYPE
  • ENUM_CONSTANT
  • RETURN_TYPE
  • IMPORT
  • VARIABLE_DECLARATION
  • FIELD
  • METHOD

dependency

By using the dependency capability, the provider finds dependencies for a given application. MTA generates a list of the application’s dependencies, and you can use this capability to query the list and check whether a certain dependency exists for the application within a given range of the dependency’s versions.

when:
  java.dependency:
    name: "<dependency_name>" 1
    upperbound: "<version_string>" 2
    lowerbound: "<version_string>" 3
1
Name of the dependency to search for.
2
Upper bound on the version of the dependency.
3
Lower bound on the version of the dependency.

2.3.8.4. Annotation inspection

You can add a query to match against specific annotations and their elements, for example:

when:
  java.referenced:
    location: METHOD
    pattern: org.package.MyApplication.runApplication(java.lang.String)
    annotated:
      pattern: org.framework.Bean
      elements:
      - name: url
        value: "http://www.example.com"

This would match against the runApplication method in the following Java code:

package org.package

import org.framework.Bean;

class MyApplication {

    @Bean(url = "http://www.example.com")
    public String runApplication(String str) {
        // ...
    }
}

The structure of the annotated YAML element is:

annotated:
  pattern: a Java regex to match the fully qualified name of the annotation (optional)
  elements: an array of elements to match within the annotation (optional)
  - name: the exact name of the element to match against
    value: a Java regex to match the value of the element

It is also possible to match an annotation with specific elements, without having to specify the symbol it annotates. The following example would also match on the @Bean annotation in the same code as the previous example:

when:
  java.referenced:
    location: ANNOTATION
    pattern: org.framework.Bean
    annotated:
      elements:
        - name: url
          value: "http://www.example.com"
Note

The only element specified with a pattern is the annotation itself.

2.3.8.5. Go provider

The go provider analyzes Go source code. This provider’s capabilities are referenced and dependency.

referenced

By using the referenced capability, the provider finds references in the source code.

when:
  go.referenced: "<regex_to_find_reference>"

dependency

By using the dependency capability, the provider finds dependencies for an application.

when:
  go.dependency:
    name: "<dependency_name>" 1
    upperbound: "<version_string>" 2
    lowerbound: "<version_string>" 3
1
Name of the dependency to search for.
2
Upper bound on the version of the dependency.
3
Lower bound on the version of the dependency.

2.3.8.6. Dotnet provider

The dotnet provider is an external provider used to analyze .NET and C# source code. Currently, the provider supports the referenced capability.

referenced

By using the referenced capability, the provider finds references in the source code.

when:
  dotnet.referenced:
    pattern: "<pattern>" 1
    namespace: "<namespace>" 2
1
pattern: A regular expression (regex) pattern to match the desired reference. For example, HttpNotFound.
2
namespace: Specifies the namespace to search within. For example, System.Web.Mvc.

2.3.9. Condition patterns

The Language Server used by the Java provider is Eclipse’s JDTLS. Internally, the JDTLS uses the Eclipse Java Development Toolkit, which includes utilities for searching code in projects.

In the pattern element of a java.referenced condition, you can search through application code by using these utilities. For more details, see Class SearchPattern, which contains all the information for building these patterns for createPattern(String, int, int, int).

Examples

  • Search for any class under the javax.xml package, occurring in any location:

    java.referenced:
      pattern: javax.xml*
    Warning

    When matching against packages, as in the previous example, the asterisk must not be after a dot. For example: * pattern: javax.xml* and not: * pattern: javax.xml.*

  • Search for method declarations that return java.lang.String:

    java.referenced:
      location: METHOD
      pattern: '* java.lang.String'
  • Search for a method named “method” declared on org.konveyor.MyClass that returns a List of a type that extends java.lang.String:

    java.referenced:
      location: METHOD
      pattern: 'org.konveyor.Myclass.method(*) java.util.List<? extends java.lang.String>'
  • Search for a class that implements java.util.List:

    java.referenced:
      location: IMPLEMENTS_TYPE
      pattern: java.util.List

2.3.10. Custom variables

Provider conditions can have associated custom variables. You can use custom variables to capture relevant information from the matched line in the source code. The values of these variables are interpolated with data matched in the source code. These values can be used to generate detailed template messages in a rule’s action (see Message actions). They can be added to a rule in the customVariables field:

- ruleID: lang-ref-004
   customVariables:
   - pattern: '([A-z]+)\.get\(\)' 1
      name: VariableName 2
    message: "Found generic call - {{ VariableName }}" 3
  when:
      java.referenced:
          location: METHOD_CALL
          pattern: com.example.apps.GenericClass.get
1
pattern: A regular expression pattern that is matched on the source code line when a match is found.
2
name: The name of the variable that can be used in templates.
3
message: A template for a message using a custom variable.

2.3.11. Logical conditions

The analyzer provides two basic logical conditions, and and or, which you can use to aggregate results of other conditions and create more complex queries.

2.3.11.1. AND condition

The and condition performs a logical AND operation on the results of an array of conditions.

The and condition matches when all of its child conditions match, for example:

when:
  and:
    - <condition1>
    - <condition2>

Example

when:
  and:
    - java.dependency:
        name: junit.junit
        upperbound: 4.12.2
        lowerbound: 4.4.0
    - java.referenced:
        location: IMPORT
        pattern: junit.junit

2.3.11.1.1. Nested conditions

Conditions can also be nested within other conditions.

  1. Example
when:
  and:
  - and:
    - go.referenced: "*CustomResourceDefinition*"
    - java.referenced:
        pattern: "*CustomResourceDefinition*"
  - go.referenced: "*CustomResourceDefinition*"

2.3.11.2. OR condition

The or condition performs a logical OR operation on the results of an array of conditions.

The or condition matches when any of its child conditions matches, for example:

when:
  or:
    - <condition1>
    - <condition2>

Example

when:
  or:
  - java.dependency:
      name: junit.junit
      upperbound: 4.12.2
      lowerbound: 4.4.0
  - java.referenced:
      location: IMPORT
      pattern: junit.junit

2.3.11.3. Chaining Condition Variables

You can use the output of one condition as the input for filtering another one in the and and or conditions. This is called condition chaining.

Example

when:
 or:
  - builtin.xml:
      xpath: "//dependencies/dependency"
      filepaths: "{{poms.filepaths}}"
    from: poms
  - builtin.file:
      pattern: pom.xml
    as: poms
    ignore: true

In the above example, the output of the builtin.file condition is saved as poms:

+

[...]
      as: poms
[...]

The variables of builtin.file can then be used in the builtin.xml condition, by writing from and then using mustache templates in the provider_ condition block.

This is how this particular condition knows how to use the variable set to the name poms.

+

[...]
    from: poms
[...]

Then you can use the variables by setting them as mustached templates in any of the inputs to the provider condition.

+

[...]
      filepaths: "{{poms.filepaths}}"
[...]
Note

If you only want to use the values of a condition as a chain, you can set ignore: true.

This will tell the engine not to use this condition to determine whether the rule has been violated or not:

+

[...]
    ignore: true
[...]
2.3.11.3.1. Chaining in the Java provider

In the java provider, the filepaths variable must be uppercased. for example:

  when:
    and:
      - java.referenced:
          pattern: org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMapping
          location: ANNOTATION
        as: annotation
      - java.referenced:
          pattern: org.springframework.stereotype.Controller
          location: ANNOTATION
          filepaths: "{{annotation.Filepaths}}"

2.3.12. Rulesets

A set of rules forms a ruleset. MTA does not require every rule file to belong to a ruleset, but you can use rulesets to group multiple rules that achieve a common goal and to pass the rules to the rules engine.

You can create a ruleset by placing one or more YAML rules in a directory and creating a ruleset.yaml file at the directory root. When you pass this directory as input to the MTA CLI by using the --rules option, all rules in this directory are treated as a part of the ruleset defined by the ruleset.yaml file.

The ruleset.yaml file stores the metadata of the ruleset.

name: "Name of the ruleset" 1
description: "Description of the ruleset"
labels: #  2
  - key=val
1
The name must be unique within the provided rulesets.
2
Ruleset labels are inherited by all rules that belong to the ruleset.

To perform any application analysis, enter:

$ mta-cli analyze --input=<application_to_analyze> --output=<output_dir> --rules=<custom_rule_dir> --enable-default-rulesets=false
  • Replace <application_to_analyze> with the name of your application.
  • Replace <output_dir> with the directory of your choice.
  • Replace <custom_rule_dir> with the custom rulesets file.

On initiation, the mta-cli tool determines the type of application and the provider needed for analysis. It then starts the provider in a container that has the required dependencies and tools. Finally, the provider uses the analyzer to execute a series of rulesets to analyze the source code.

2.3.13. Creating a basic YAML ruleset template

If you want to group multiple similar rules, you can create a ruleset for them by placing their files in a directory and creating a ruleset.yaml file at the directory’s root. When you pass this directory as input to the MTA CLI using the --rules option, MTA treats all the files in the directory as belonging to the ruleset defined in the ruleset.yaml file.

Procedure

  1. Create a template for ruleset.yaml files if you want to pass the entire directory using the --rules option:

    name: <RULESET_NAME> 1
    description: <RULESET_DESCRIPTION>
    labels: 2
      - key=val
    1
    The name must be unique within the provided rulesets.
    2
    Ruleset labels are inherited by all rules that belong to the ruleset.

2.3.14. Creating a YAML rule

Each rule file contains one or more YAML rules. Every rule comprises metadata, conditions and actions.

Procedure

  1. Create a when condition.

    The when condition of a YAML rule can be provider, and or or.

    1. Create a provider condition

      The provider condition is used to define a search query for a specific language provider and to invoke a certain capability of the provider.

      The condition’s general format is <provider_name>.<capability>. The condition also has inner fields to specify details of the search. The way you create a provider condition and its inner fields depends on which provider you use and which capability you invoke.

      The table below lists the available providers and their capabilities. Select a provider and its capability that suit the purpose of the rule you want to create. This part of the condition does not contain any of the condition’s fields yet.

      ProviderCapabilityDescription

      java

      referenced

      Finds references of a pattern, including annotations, with an optional code location for detailed searches

      dependency

      Checks whether the application has a given dependency

      builtin

      xml

      Searches XML files using XPath queries

      json

      Searches JSON files using JSONPath queries

      filecontent

      Searches content in regular files using RegEx patterns

      file

      Finds files with names matching a given pattern

      hasTags

      Checks whether a tag is created for the application through a tagging rule

      go

      referenced

      Finds references of a pattern

      dependency

      Checks whether the application has a given dependency

      The example below shows a java provider condition that uses the referenced capability.

      Example

      when:
        java.referenced:
  2. Add suitable fields to the provider condition.

    The table below lists all available providers, their capabilities, and their fields. Select the fields that belong to the provider and capability that you have chosen. Note that some fields are mandatory.

    ProviderCapabilityFieldRequired?Description

    java

    referenced

    pattern

    Yes

    RegEx pattern

    location

    No

    Source code location; see below for a list of all supported search locations

    annotated

    No

    Annotations and their elements (name and value)

    dependency

    name

    Yes

    Name of the dependency

    nameregex

    No

    RegEx pattern to match the name

    upperbound

    No

    Matches version numbers lower than or equal to

    lowerbound

    No

    Matches version numbers greater than or equal to

    builtin

    xml

    xpath

    Yes

    XPath query

    namespaces

    No

    A map to scope down query to namespaces

    filepaths

    No

    Optional list of files to scope down search

    json

    xpath

    Yes

    XPath query

    filepaths

    No

    Optional list of files to scope down search

    filecontent

    pattern

    Yes

    RegEx pattern to match in content

    filePattern

    No

    Only searches in files with names matching this pattern

    file

    pattern

    Yes

    Finds files with names matching this pattern

    hasTags

    This is an inline list of string tags. See Tag Actions in Rule Actions for details on tag format.

    go

    referenced

    pattern

    Yes

    RegEx pattern

    dependency

    name

    Yes

    Name of the dependency

    nameregex

    No

    RegEx pattern to match the name

    upperbound

    No

    Matches version numbers lower than or equal to

    lowerbound

    No

    Matches version numbers greater than or equal to

    The following search locations can be used to scope down java searches:

    • CONSTRUCTOR_CALL
    • TYPE
    • INHERITANCE
    • METHOD_CALL
    • ANNOTATION
    • IMPLEMENTS_TYPE
    • ENUM_CONSTANT
    • RETURN_TYPE
    • IMPORT
    • VARIABLE_DECLARATION

      The example below shows the when condition of a rule that searches for references of a package.

      Example

      when:
        java.referenced:
          location: PACKAGE
          pattern: org.jboss*
  3. Create an AND or OR condition

    • An and condition matches when all of its child conditions match. Create an and condition as follows:

      when:
        and:
        - java.dependency:
            name: junit.junit
            upperbound: 4.12.2
            lowerbound: 4.4.0
        - java.referenced:
            location: IMPORT
            pattern: junit.junit
    • An or condition matches when any of its child conditions match. Create an or condition as follows:

      when:
        or:
        - java.dependency:
            name: junit.junit
            upperbound: 4.12.2
            lowerbound: 4.4.0
        - java.referenced:
            location: IMPORT
            pattern: junit.junit

2.3.15. Running an analysis using a custom YAML rule

To run an analysis, use the --rules option in the CLI.

Procedure

  • To use the rules in a single rule file, /home/<USER>/rule.yaml, run the following command:

    mta-cli analyze --input /home/<USER>/data/ --output /home/<USER>/output/ --rules /home/<USER>/rule.yaml

    where:

    • /home/<USER>/data/ - the directory of the source code or binary
    • /home/<USER>/output/ - the directory for reports (HTML and YAML)
  • To use multiple rule files, you need to place them in a directory and to add a ruleset.yaml file. Then the directory is treated as a ruleset, and you can pass it as input to the --rules option.

Note that if you wish to use the --target or --source option in the CLI, the engine will only select rules that match the label for that target. Therefore, make sure that you have added target or source labels on your rules. See Reserved labels for more details.

2.4. Creating your first YAML rule

This section guides you through the process of creating and testing your first MTA YAML-based rule. This assumes that you have already installed MTA. See Installing and running the CLI in the CLI Guide for installation instructions.

In this example, you will create a rule to discover instances where an application defines a jboss-web.xml file containing a <class-loading> element and to provide a link to the documentation that describes how to migrate the code.

2.4.1. Creating a YAML file for the rule

  • Create a YAML file for your first rule.
$ mkdir /home/<USER>/rule.yaml

2.4.2. Creating data to test the rule

  1. Create jboss-web.xml and pom.xml files in a directory:

    mkdir /home/<USER>/data/
    touch /home/<USER>/data/jboss-web.xml
    touch /home/<USER>/data/pom.xml
  2. In the jboss-web.xml file you created, paste the following content:

    <!DOCTYPE jboss-web PUBLIC "-//JBoss//DTD Web Application 4.2//EN" "http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss-web_4_2.dtd">
    <jboss-web>
        <class-loading java2ClassLoadingCompliance="false">
            <loader-repository>
                seam.jboss.org:loader=@projectName@
                <loader-repository-config>java2ParentDelegation=false</loader-repository-config>
            </loader-repository>
        </class-loading>
    </jboss-web>
  3. In the pom.xml file you created, paste the following content:

    <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
    
      <groupId>test</groupId>
      <artifactId>test</artifactId>
      <version>1.1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
    
      <properties>
    	<maven.compiler.source>1.7</maven.compiler.source>
    	<maven.compiler.target>1.7</maven.compiler.target>
      </properties>
    
      <dependencies>
      </dependencies>
    </project>

2.4.3. Creating the rule

MTA YAML-based rules use the following rule pattern:

when(condition)
  perform(action)

Procedure

  • In the rule.yaml file you created, paste the following contents:

    - ruleID: <UNIQUE_RULE_ID> 1
      description: <DESCRIPTION> 2
      when:
        <CONDITION(S)> 3
      message: <MESSAGE> 4
      labels: <LABELS> 5
      effort: <EFFORT> 6
      links:
      - <LINKS> 7
    1
    Unique ID for your rule. For example, jboss5-web-class-loading.
    2
    Text description of the rule.
    3
    Complete the when block specifying one or more conditions:
    1. Use the builtin provider’s XML capability because this rule checks for a match in an XML file.
    2. To match on the class-loading element that is a child of jboss-web, use the XPath expression jboss-web/web-loading as an XML query. In this case, you need just one condition:

      when:
        builtin.xml:
          xpath: jboss-web/class-loading
    4
    Helpful message explaining the migration issue. The message is generated in the report when the rule matches. For example:
    message: The class-loading element is no longer valid in the jboss-web.xml file.
    5
    List of string labels for the rule.
    6
    Number of expected story points to fix this issue.
    7
    One or more hyperlinks pointing to documentation around the migration issues that you find.
    links:
    - url: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.4/html-single/Migration_Guide/index.html#Create_or_Modify_Files_That_Control_Class_Loading_in_JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform_6
      title: Create or Modify Files That Control Class Loading in JBoss EAP 6

    The rule is now complete and looks similar to the following:

    - ruleID: jboss5-web-class-loading
      description: Find class loading element in JBoss XML file.
      when:
        builtin.xml:
          xpath: jboss-web/class-loading
      message: The class-loading element is no longer valid in the jboss-web.xml file.
      effort: 3
      links:
      - url: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.4/html-single/Migration_Guide/index.html#Create_or_Modify_Files_That_Control_Class_Loading_in_JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform_6
        title: Create or Modify Files That Control Class Loading in JBoss EAP 6

2.4.4. Installing the rule

Procedure

  • Point the CLI to the rule file you created :

    –rules /home/<USER>/rules.yaml

2.4.5. Testing the rule

Procedure

To test the rule, point the input to the test data you created and pass the rule using the rules option in MTA CLI:

mta-cli analyze --input /home/<USER>/data/ --output /home/<USER>/output/ --rules /home/<USER>/rules.yaml

2.4.6. Reviewing the report

Review the report to be sure that it provides the expected results.

Procedure

  1. Once the analysis is complete, the command outputs the path to the HTML report:

    INFO[0066] Static report created. Access it at this URL:  URL="file:/home/<USER>/output/static-report/index.html"

    Open /home/<USER_NAME>/output/static-report/index.html in a web browser.

  2. Navigate to the Issues tab in the left menu.
  3. Verify that the rule is executed:

    1. In the Issues table, type JBoss XML in the search bar.
    2. Verify that the issue with the title Find class loading element in JBoss XML file is present in the table.
  4. Click the jboss-web.xml link to open the affected file.

Appendix A. Reference material

A.1. About rule story points

A.1.1. What are story points?

Story points are an abstract metric commonly used in Agile software development to estimate the level of effort needed to implement a feature or change.

The Migration Toolkit for Applications uses story points to express the level of effort needed to migrate particular application constructs, and the application as a whole. It does not necessarily translate to man-hours, but the value should be consistent across tasks.

A.1.2. How story points are estimated in rules

Estimating the level of effort for the story points for a rule can be tricky. The following are the general guidelines MTA uses when estimating the level of effort required for a rule.

Level of EffortStory PointsDescription

Information

0

An informational warning with very low or no priority for migration.

Trivial

1

The migration is a trivial change or a simple library swap with no or minimal API changes.

Complex

3

The changes required for the migration task are complex, but have a documented solution.

Redesign

5

The migration task requires a redesign or a complete library change, with significant API changes.

Rearchitecture

7

The migration requires a complete rearchitecture of the component or subsystem.

Unknown

13

The migration solution is not known and may need a complete rewrite.

A.1.3. Task category

In addition to the level of effort, you can categorize migration tasks to indicate the severity of the task. The following categories are used to group issues to help prioritize the migration effort.

Mandatory
The task must be completed for a successful migration. If the changes are not made, the resulting application will not build or run successfully. Examples include replacement of proprietary APIs that are not supported in the target platform.
Optional
If the migration task is not completed, the application should work, but the results may not be optimal. If the change is not made at the time of migration, it is recommended to put it on the schedule soon after your migration is completed.
Potential
The task should be examined during the migration process, but there is not enough detailed information to determine if the task is mandatory for the migration to succeed. An example of this would be migrating a third-party proprietary type where there is no directly compatible type.
Information
The task is included to inform you of the existence of certain files. These may need to be examined or modified as part of the modernization effort, but changes are typically not required.

A.2. Additional resources

Legal Notice

Copyright © 2025 Red Hat, Inc.
The text of and illustrations in this document are licensed by Red Hat under a Creative Commons Attribution–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ("CC-BY-SA"). An explanation of CC-BY-SA is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. In accordance with CC-BY-SA, if you distribute this document or an adaptation of it, you must provide the URL for the original version.
Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, the Red Hat logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries.
Linux® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries.
Java® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates.
XFS® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries.
MySQL® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries.
Node.js® is an official trademark of Joyent. Red Hat is not formally related to or endorsed by the official Joyent Node.js open source or commercial project.
The OpenStack® Word Mark and OpenStack logo are either registered trademarks/service marks or trademarks/service marks of the OpenStack Foundation, in the United States and other countries and are used with the OpenStack Foundation's permission. We are not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by the OpenStack Foundation, or the OpenStack community.
All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.